Pro-Coast Case Studies
EU CS1 Comino island | Malta | Partner: Friends of the Earth, Malta
21 Feb 2024
Comino is a small island (2.75 km2) in the Mediterranean. Biodiversity status and values. Malta's largest biological reserve, but suffering degradation due to lack of sustainable management. ReNature Project - aims to carry out habitat restoration of specific sites of Comino Island. Challenges. Soil issues: littering, trampling and vehicle use. Gravel dragging. Invasive alien species (IAS) and non-native trees, as well as, grazing and predation from rodents and wild rabbits. Landscape disruptors: pig farm and associated pollution, unintegrated structures and constructions. Community and cultural context. The island has only 2 inhabitants. The massive arrival of tourists in summer creates a great impact on the island. It is necessary to raise awareness among visitors of the impact they can create on the island. Economic engine and primary production. Tourism and associated commercial activity (seasonal). Others: Pig farm, hotel, shipyard. Governance. Special Area of Conservation – SAC (Habitats Directive - 92/43/EEC). Special Protection Area - SPA (Birds Directive - 79/409/EEC). PRO-COAST ACTIONS: (1) Support social transformation for visitors: Citizen science on site, informational material, briefing prior to getting on ferry, nature walks. (2) Implementation of the RN2000 Kemmuna u lGżejjer ta’ Madwarha management plan: Introduction of sustainable agricultural practices and soil restoration.
EU CS2 Apulia | Italy | Partner: University of Salento
22 Feb 2024
We will study the protected area of Aquatina di Frigole in the Mediterranean. Biodiversity status and values. Iconic species Pinna nobilis, native birds and nesting Caretta caretta. Pocket beaches, lagoon basins, Posidonia oceanica meadows (sea); banquette (ashore), Mediterranean maquis, man-made lagoon drainage system. Challenges. Scarce management of lagoon-sea connection; Small-scale oil spills; Antifouling dispersions and docking. Illegal activities in the lagoon: fishing; water sports; Littering; Community and cultural context. After an initial investment in R&D infrastructure, the area was abandoned, leaving it exposed to illegal activities, and the social trust is to be recovered. Dry-walls surrounding the lagoon basins are traditional architecture heritage. Economic engine and primary production. Small-scale fishery; Recreational and educational activities (active or immersive interactions between school students, local citizens or visitors with the ecosystem). Governance. University of Salento is in charge of this Natura 2000 site. Coastline managed by municipalities following national and international regulations. Connections with recent project: Interreg (AdrIon) IMPRECO. PRO-COAST ACTIONS: (1) Increase awareness of local communities and summer visitors of the site’ potential due to its natural condition; (2) Increase literacy about the species of community importance through the setup of a didactic path and citizen monitoring. (3) Capitalize on previous research work via its dissemination and involvement of the local and visiting population. (4) Assess the systemic correlation between marine litter and NIS as indirect drivers; illegal activities as direct drivers, and changes in biodiversity.
EU CS3 Area of Strunjan | Slovenia | Partner: University of Primorska
22 Feb 2024
This study is of a Public beach in a natural area in Adriatic Sea. Biodiversity status and values. Coastal habitats. Protected species: Cladocora caespitosa, Pinna nobilis, Ruppia cirrhosa and Zostera marina; birds,mammals and lizards. Challenges. Soil erosion, disturbance of wildlife due to tourism. Presence of litter: attracting large numbers of seagulls and increase the risk of zoonosis. Community and cultural context. Step Change H2020 Project promotes local engagement and environmental awareness: APP, involving citizen science and professional science collecting biodiversity data, and also Changes in community behaviour. Economic engine and primary production. Seasonal tourism. Governance. Krajinski Park Strunjan, Municipality of Piran. Decisions are taken between members of the Step Change consortium (the University of Primorska) and the committee of the protected areas. PRO-COAST ACTIONS: (1) Use of citizen data science to raise environmental awareness through Step Change APP and upgrade of functionalities. Dedicated engagement activities, such as meeting with organizations and local communities. (2) Expansion of outreach and engagement activities in the two protected areas, focused on human-wildlife interactions.
Non-EU CS4 Boka Kotorska Bay area | Partner: Montenegro Chamber of Economy
22 Feb 2024
This Montenegran bay is the largest in the Adriatic. Biodiversity status and values. 21 benthic habitats in the bay. Coastal Terrigenous Muds. Particular Coralligenous aggregations. Seagrass meadows. 25 Deep holes with possible presence of Cladocora. Challenges. Land-based influence: construction in coastal zone. Cruising tourism: hydrocarbon releases; noise; sewage and grey water; garbage, etc. Uncontrolled fishing and coral harvesting. Recreational boating anchoring in seagrass meadows. Community and cultural context. Inhabited since antiquity. Pilgrimage site (Catholic and Orthodox). Economic engine and primary production. Tourism, nautical sports, cruises. Fishing: 94% subsistence. Governance. Coastline managed by municipalities following national and international regulations. Public Enterprise for Coastal Zone Management of Montenegro manages the use and protects the coastal zone of Montenegro that consist of narrow coastal land strip (public maritime domain) and the territorial sea. PRO-COAST ACTIONS: (1) Identify benefits from technological developments that reduce biodiversity ecological footprint. (2) Perform management of resources needs that can be fulfilled while maintaining cultural integrity, essential ecological processes, biological diversity and life support systems. (3) Digital library consisting of identified species in Boka coastal area, and related itineraries. (4) Identification and adjustment of policies for conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. (5) Science-based assessments and priorities in policymaking in terms of identifying most needed conservation and management policy initiatives.
EU CS5 Sligo | Ireland | Partner: Atlantic Technological University
22 Feb 2024
Streedagh beach is on the Atlantic Ocean. Biodiversity status and values. Coastal dunes and sandy shores and Mesic grasslands. Challenges. Sea level rise and climate extreme events. Coastal Erosion and flooding. Community and cultural context. Historic, cultural, commercial, industrial, retail and service centre of regional importance in the North West of Ireland. Economic engine and primary production. Tourism, with many visitors to the coast & mountains, as well as various areas of archaeological importance. Governance. Sligo living lab is part of SCORE H2020 project, addressing the establishment of vegetated buffer areas in dune systems as hybrid NBS, testing several coastal protection bioengineering solutions. Managed by IT Sligo and Sligo County Council. PRO-COAST ACTIONS: (1) Engagement of Local Coastal Community groups (2) Awareness campaign (3) Surveys of local residents/visitors to these areas with regard to their awareness of sand dune protection measures, willingness to comply, value of ecosystems.
Non- EU CS6 Arne Parish | UK | Partner: Anatrack
22 Feb 2024
Our study is a river estuary and coast. Biodiversity status and values. Rural area formed by grassland, heathland, woodland, river estuary and coast. Challenges. Intense farm grazing/ hedge cutting; N/P run-off; IAS; restoring heath fells trees; mineral extraction. Community and cultural context. Rural area. Local community is broadly supportive of conservation, but there is a lack of community engagement. Economic engine and primary production. Agriculture, mineral extractive industries. Governance. 60% of the land is protected. PRO-COAST ACTIONS: Involving all the community, 3 projects proposed: (1) plant once-common-now-rare plants as food for birds/butterflies (cultural ES); (2) create ponds for inverts/amphibia which feed birds (regulatory ES); (3) restore red squirrels from adjacent offshore islands (aid carbon sequestration).
Non-EU CS7 Bergen | Norway | Partner: University of Bergen
22 Feb 2024
Our coast is a fjord surrounded by mountains. Biodiversity status and values. Diverse habitats: coniferous woodland, temperate shrub heathland, rock cliffs, ledges and shores, ice-dominated habitats. Challenges. Enhance biodiversity. Noise and landscape degradation. Community and cultural context. Local community is concerned about the modification of the environment. They are sceptical about not enjoying their living conditions due to noise or pollution. Economic engine and primary production. The natural area provides recreation, fitness; de-stressing or mental health; eco-tourism. Employment generated by constructions and infrastructures. Governance. Land is mostly owned by Bergen municipality (control development), subject to conservation orders in place on historic buildings and the approval of the Norwegian Environment Agency. PRO-COAST ACTIONS: (1) Enhancing the biodiversity within the area and integrate a new neighbourhood with affordable housing. (2) Engage with local stakeholders working to develop the cultural infrastructure and physical infrastructure to ensure awareness of biodiversity impacts and sustainable social transformation
EU CS8 Kloogaranna-Laulasmaa | Estonia | Partner Tallin Institute of Technology
22 Feb 2024
Our sandy beaches are on the Baltic Sea. Biodiversity status and values. Coastal dunes and sandy shores. Challenges. Environmental impact generated by urban pressure and the proximity to the capital. Community and cultural context. Dense populated, high number of seasonal visitors. Social controversy: local communities concerned about environmental impact, and economic interests. Economic engine and primary production. Seasonal tourism, second homes. Real state pressure. Governance. Planning (green infrastructure elements), legislative (protected coastal zones) and conservational (protected area) activities/measures affecting the preservation of biodiversity. PRO-COAST ACTIONS: (1) Social dimension - interest of different stakeholder groups, of high-quality public spaces and accessibility, development of recreational ecosystem services, sustainable economy. (2) Multi-level governance dimension to integrate the positions and interests of local and central authorities (3) Evidence based inputs from researchers and stakeholders for high-quality decision making and facilitation of stakeholder involvement processes (4) Interviews, participatory events and mapping actions.
EU CS9 Corbu | Romania | Partner: Total PR
22 Feb 2024
This is a virgin beach on the Black Sea. Biodiversity status and values. Sandy shore, riparian forests, dystrophic lakes, sandbanks Challenges. Non-existence of a supervisory body with knowledge about the coastal ecosystem. Community and cultural context. Lack of environmental awareness, over tourism, inability to perceive and adopt environmental solutions. Economic engine and primary production. Tourism. Governance. Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. PRO-COAST ACTIONS: (1) Local community engagement and environmental awareness: photos, surveys, etc. (2) Support high level and facilitate stakeholder involvement process. (3) highlight the environmental importance of the local flora and fauna, resulting that the local community, the local stakeholders and policy makers will continue and even more will increase their support to the ecosystem conservation.
The project methodology will be tested in nine case studies located on the European continent, both in EU and non-EU areas. The coastal ecosystem is the common thread running through all the case studies, but each one presents specific issues and its own framework for addressing them. There are three Mediterranean cases, three cases in the North-east Atlantic Ocean, one case in the Baltic Sea and one case in the Black Sea. They include island and continental coastal environments.
The following aspects were considered for the selection of case studies:
(1) the biodiversity of the area and the challenges that threaten it;
(2) the community that inhabits it and the cultural context in which they live;
(3) the economic driver and primary production; in addition,
(4) governance arrangements have been identified.
For all case studies, relevant stakeholders have been selected. Our work will include profiles of governance, NGOs, communities and scientists.